Customer Centric Solutions LLC
About

I study why buyers move — and why they don't.

John Gusiff, Founder and Managing Partner of Customer Centric Solutions LLC. Twenty-five years spent finding what actually moves buyers — and building the go-to-market that acts on it. Design for customer progress, and growth follows.

Practice
Boutique
Based in
Seattle, WA
Focus
B2B, seed–Series B
John Gusiff, Founder and Managing Partner of Customer Centric Solutions LLC
LinkedIn
What I do

Five goals, and the evidence each one needs.

Not stages in a sequence — goals a team designs for, usually several at once. Each one fails for a different reason, and each one needs a different kind of evidence to fix. Most of what I do is finding which goal is actually the binding constraint, then getting the evidence that moves it.

Each card below opens the interview type that answers it. Working from a symptom rather than a goal? Start from what's going wrong →

Acquisition

Attracts new customers, users, partners, or opportunities by making adoption more likely.

You're counting the deals that happened — not the ones that never started.

Engagement

Increases the frequency, depth, or quality of interaction, creating more value with each use.

Onboarding completion isn't value realized. Plenty of accounts finish setup and never come back.

Retention

Increases the likelihood that customers continue using the product by raising realized value or switching costs.

Your health score is green. The decision to leave was made months before the usage dropped.

Expansion

Enables additional growth from existing relationships through more users, use cases, products, markets, or revenue.

The customers who expand are also the ones who refer, review, and vouch — which is where acquisition starts again.
Goal 05 · What happens when someone copies us?

Defensibility

Creates structural advantages that become increasingly difficult for competitors to replicate or overcome.

The one goal you don't pursue directly — it's what the other four produce when they compound. Loop & moats diagnostics →

How I think

Funnels end. Loops feed themselves.

Conversion data tells you a deal died. It won't tell you the buyer was never going to move, or that the message was aimed at a struggle they don't have, or that the thing blocking them had nothing to do with your product. A funnel is a record of what already happened.

It's also a shape that ends. A funnel converts a prospect and stops — next quarter starts empty. A loop takes the output of one cycle, a customer or a review or a piece of usage, and turns it into the input of the next one.

So most go-to-market work treats demand as something you capture. I treat it as something you have to see first, and then something you can compound. The reasons people switch and the reasons they stay put are knowable — they just aren't in your CRM.

Funnel to loop Awareness, consideration, trial, purchase, and revenue laid out as a one-way funnel that ends at revenue. Alongside it, three closed loops modeled on the compounding-loops system Notion uses to grow, each fully self-contained: a Skill loop (build workflow, use workflow, learn what works, refine and reuse) and a User loop (share workspace, invite collaborator, collaborate, create and share) on either side of the dominant Content loop (create page, organize content, link knowledge, reuse or share). Four short, standalone arrows in the open space between the loops annotate how they reinforce each other, without touching either loop's own cycle. Each loop carries its own trigger above, and below, a compounding asset paired with the value the loop retains for the customer. THE OLD MODEL A straight line from awareness to revenue — then it ends. THE NEW MODEL Three closed loops, each feeding the others — the shape Notion uses to compound its own growth. Awareness Consideration Trial Purchase Revenue TRIGGER Need to structure or improve recurring work Build workflow Use workflow Learn what works Refine and reuse SKILL LOOP RETENTION · SUPPORTING COMPOUNDING ASSET Team proficiency + reusable working patterns RETAINED VALUE Faster, easier, more consistent work TRIGGER Need to capture or organize work Create page Organize content Link knowledge Reuse or share CONTENT LOOP ACQUISITION · DOMINANT COMPOUNDING ASSET Connected workspace content RETAINED VALUE Reusable organizational knowledge TRIGGER Need another person to participate Share workspace Invite collaborator Collaborate Create and share USER LOOP EXPANSION · SUBORDINATE COMPOUNDING ASSET Active collaboration network RETAINED VALUE Connected people, context, and work Reusable patterns improve content Connected knowledge improves workflows Collaborators create more content Shared work creates reasons to invite

Five kinds of loops

Named by what compounds and what the customer retains — not by the channel it runs through. Co-created with Krzysztof Czubak.

User
Each cycle turns existing users into a source of new ones. Compounds per interaction.
Content
Each cycle adds information that makes the product more valuable. Compounds continuously.
Trust
Each cycle reduces uncertainty for the next customer. Compounds over years.
Skill
Each cycle makes users better at the product. Compounds monthly.
Capital
Each cycle generates surplus that funds the next. Compounds quarterly.

Check your own

Whether a company actually has a loop, or a funnel dressed as one, is what the two loop diagnostics are built to answer. One looks across the whole business; the other tests a single loop.

Background

Twenty-five years, and the same shape every time.

Most of my career was spent alongside CX and CMO leaders — strategy and execution both, across the full arc from acquisition to defensibility.

Startups and scale-ups

Advisory, strategy, research, and experience design — ecobee, Porch.com, ModeSens, Stillaton, Narrio, erom.io.

At enterprise scale

American Honda, lululemon, Canada Goose, Citibank, Disney, eBay, G Adventures, TransAlta, Kaiser Permanente.

B2C
One person, deciding alone, in thirty seconds.
Same forces, different weight
B2B
A buying committee, deciding over nine months.

Working across both ends taught me where the line actually sits. The forces that move or stall a decision are the same ones. How they show up is not: a consumer's anxiety is about wasting money, a committee member's is about their reputation. More people, more risk, and more time change which forces dominate and how long they take to resolve.

How I research it

01 · Find

The struggling moment

Nobody wakes up wanting your product. Demand begins when the way someone gets a job done stops working well enough. Find that moment and you find the market. Miss it and you're writing to people who aren't looking.

02 · Read

The forces inside it

Six forces, not four. Three move people toward change; three hold them still. The second three are usually where the answer is, and the interviews are built to surface them.

03 · Design

The block out

Naming a barrier doesn't remove it. As a certified instructor in Massimo Ingegno's Make It Toolkit, I turn findings into behavioral design that removes friction rather than describing it.

→ Toward change What people volunteer
PushThe current way stops working well enough.
PullA better way becomes easy to picture.
DesireThe progress they want to be able to claim.
← Holding still Where the answer usually is
HabitThe familiar routine that still mostly works.
AnxietyFear the new way won't deliver, or will cost them.
AvoidanceWhat they'd rather not face, so nothing gets decided.

Most practice concentrates on the left column because those are the forces people volunteer. The right column is why a market with an obvious problem still won't move.

There are people behind every number on the dashboard.

They're trying to make progress on something that matters to them, and something is standing in the way.

Find the progress→Find the block→Design it out

Everything else (the interviews, the loops, the moats) is machinery in service of that.

Teaching and writing

Most of the method is public.

Reading Demand · Mondays

Why buyers look, stall, switch, and stay.

Behavioral research on demand across the Cycle of Customer Progress. Seasonal, five to six issues at a time.

Subscribe free
Stacking Moats · Wednesdays

Why some growth compounds.

Defensibility, loops, and the moats that turn out to be walls around empty ground.

Subscribe free
Live & cohort · Maven
Lightning lessons
Self-paced · Thinkific
Written · Free
  • Stacking Moats — a weekly newsletter on defensibility, published Wednesdays.
  • Reading Demand — why buyers look, stall, switch, and stay. Behavioral research on demand across the Cycle of Customer Progress, published Mondays.
  • Fifteen published scorecards — the 8 Moats instrument run in public and written up, scores ranging from 18/24 down to 2/24, so you can judge the analysis before you hire it.
Get in touch

Fifteen minutes is usually enough to know.

Whether you need research, which method fits, or whether you need research at all. If the answer is that you don't, that's a fine outcome for a short call.

Boutique means assembled, not small. I lead every engagement and do the analysis myself. Around that I build the team the work requires — recruiters, moderators, quantitative analysts, designers — drawn from people I've worked with for years. Senior judgment on every project, the capacity of a firm, and no bench to pay for between engagements.